| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 |
101. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Xylengra My money is on some corporate-speak using many words to say not much of anything at all. Those expecting a proclamation from the heavens with a final solution attached will be disappointed. My money is on them ...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.03.20 12:48:00
|
102. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Arnakoz i read the entirety of the university page, and noted the part of While not all of these behaviors are exhibited by all miner bot programs, careful observation of their behaviors over time will demonstrate which o...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.03.17 00:36:00
|
103. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: riverini I wonder if moving L4 to lowsec would help to curv the misison bot issue.. ? same for better rat intel, nothing Sansha/Sleeper like, but something that throws some challenge... Nope. Hauler bots run the gauntle...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.03.16 21:54:00
|
104. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Arnakoz all i'm saying is that giving a list of such broadly scoped items, with a high chance of overlap, is not a good idea if you really intend to fight bots; as it will merely flood CCP with more non-bots to check, and e...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.03.16 21:50:00
|
105. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Arnakoz * This character is always online fighting PVE rats from server up to server down. * This character always docks up or logs off whenever a neutral enters the system. * This character fails to respond to requests fo...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.03.16 03:05:00
|
106. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Arnakoz Edited by: Arnakoz on 15/03/2011 12:40:44 the Bot University page on reportBots is wholly inaccurate. all of these items have even been gone over multiple times in this very thread. but, lets do it again... (sig...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.03.16 02:49:00
|
107. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Sreegs Originally by: Consortium Agent A big post that I can't quote :( Hey guy thanks for the kind words. I didn't run away from the thread or anything there's just A) Only so much to say at the moment wi...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.03.15 04:51:00
|
108. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Sreegs Originally by: DonHel Is there any way to report bots and actually have something done, or do we have to watch them do it everyday and just live with it. And just occasionally pop their hulks/covetors/retr...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.03.14 23:22:00
|
109. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Shoopa Whoopa #Edit: I also just netted post 1337 in this thread. lol nice!
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.03.01 00:53:00
|
110. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Vincent Athena I asked these before but did not get an answer. Are the bots so prevalent that we no longer have a player driven economy? CCP advertises that EVE has a player driven economy. If this is not true, is CCP brea...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.03.01 00:51:00
|
111. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Consortium Agent on 28/02/2011 13:15:20 Originally by: Kizz Amarr CCP are responsible for the mechanics of the game. It is their baby so to speak. CCP understand the mechanics of the game can be used by third party software...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.02.28 13:10:00
|
112. New Dev Blog: Out of the Shadows - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Hooray! More complexes for the RMT alliances to bot! w00t!
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.02.27 15:08:00
|
113. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Consortium Agent on 27/02/2011 14:35:59 Originally by: Florestan Bronstein Originally by: Consortium Agent I have it on good authority that CCP *will* accept petitions for bots. How those petitions are generated is n...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.02.27 14:35:00
|
114. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Halcyon Ingenium Originally by: Consortium Agent I have it on good authority that CCP *will* accept petitions for bots. How those petitions are generated is not CCP's problem, but they will accept petitions. Iro...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.02.27 14:26:00
|
115. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Othran This is such complete unmitigated bull**** that its not funny. You are clueless. CCP will accept NO DATA from your site. It won't happen. Ever. There is no point in petitioning botters unless you know FOR SURE tha...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.02.27 13:52:00
|
116. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
One more thing I figured I might as well bring up since it's relevant to the discussion. I'm sure everyone who has filed a bot report has received the defacto form mail response that CCP thanks you and that if you don't see immediate action not t...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.02.26 21:38:00
|
117. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Othran Nina it basically said "yes any info on bots would be welcome". The GM (name was redacted by poster before CCP got here) who responded seemed to believe that a third-party site collating "evidence" would be fine. ...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.02.26 21:04:00
|
118. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Consortium Agent on 26/02/2011 07:38:09 Originally by: Nina Mercedez Edited by: Nina Mercedez on 25/02/2011 18:32:05 If they came here and said that information would be useful, and used, maybe I would. Without that I'm ...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.02.26 07:36:00
|
119. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Nina Mercedez Integral, and essential. I'd like to see them give some people GM powers, not paid or anything, and have them go find bots, and amass solid proof. Have IA monitor them, of course. Hell, I'd volunteer, it's not...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.02.25 18:19:00
|
120. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Nina Mercedez 1. re: Problem/solution, that means CCP are part of the problem. If that's the case, we're all doomed. 2. Save your ink. If/when I choose to bot, it won't be with this char/account. 3. After almost 3 months wi...
- by Consortium Agent - at 2011.02.25 18:14:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |